Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
*Last updated June 2024.
Frendle even stoops to pretending an accusation of sexual abuse exists (regarding another case, not mine) when such a report irrefutably does not exist, and never has -- per CPS!
The evidence undeniably proves Frendle is habitually corrupt to the extreme, and there are plenty of others she has defamed and defrauded to the umpteenth degree. The following facts are a prime example of just how depraved Frendle is. To paint another dad’s house (dad involved in a custody battle) as a dangerous place for his two children to live, Frendle put in her official report that the guy’s wife (his kids’ stepmother, who is a pediatric ER registered nurse) had been accused in a CPS report of sexually abusing her own 11yr old son. CPS confirmed no such report exists or has ever existed! Frendle also included in her official report that her private meeting with the woman’s 11yr old son included she asking if his mom ever touches his private areas and Frendle claimed the boy reported she rubs his penis through his pants when he’s feeling sick! Frendle truly has no shame! For the same woman, Frendle knowingly falsely reported she had failed a drug test. There was an addendum to the test in which the testing company confirmed prescribedAdderall was the sole reason for the false-positive for amphetamine and Frendle pretended no such addendum exists – despite that she was provided a copy! Why did Frendle so horribly defame the poor woman? Simply because her partner is male and Frendle wanted “proof” to back up her “finding that it’s in the children’s best interests” that their father, a longtime EMT with zero criminal record, be awarded supervised custody only!
Frendle gets away with her countless illegal sexist and otherwise corrupt acts because the governmental body who’s supposed to hold her accountable, the Texas Behavioral Health Executive Council (BHEC is what they go by) overflows with corruption itself and thus sweeps all of Frendle’s illegal activities under the rug each time a complaint is filed against her. Kenneth Long is the latest BHEC official to prove himself corrupt to the core by “finding” Frendle “did nothing wrong” when she falsely reported the existence of sexual abuse accusations to a court, falsely reported to a court that the same custody battle litigant’s wife had failed a drug test, and was complicit in so many other lies and coverups to “justify” her “findings.
NEW: *SEE BELOW LETTER -- WHICH IS OFFICIAL PUNISHMENT FINALLY ISSUED BY THE STATE OF TEXAS TO ONE OF THOSE WHO CONSPIRED WITH FRENDLE TO COMMIT THE MOST UNFATHOMABLY EGREGIOUS AND UNFATHOMABLY STUPID (WAS SO VERY EASY TO PROVE) AFFIDAVIT FRAUD YOU COULD EVER IMAGINE. IT’S ONLY A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE OFFICIAL LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY IS ALSO SERVED UP TO FRENDLE.
***For background to said affidavit fraud, please scroll to the top of this page and click “Frendle’s Affidavit Fraud.”
The below letter speaks for itself. That the Secretary of State’s Office suspension of the criminal, Alisha Morgan, was for only one month is an abomination. An abomination because: 1) the number of basic yet critically important to abide by notary-specific laws Morgan violated, 2) the people responsible for the inexcusable slap on the wrist/darn near zero deterrent punishment, Laura Valerio and an SOS board consisting of only attorneys (imagine that), knew all along that the monumental level of fraud was committed during the course of a custody battle by Jennifer Frendle, paralegal/notary Alisha Morgan, opposing counsel at the time, Amanda Coffey (who is Morgan’s boss), and (redacted) in an effort to do nothing less than emotionally destroy my son by tearing him and me, his lifelong GOOD father, apart for many months if not years. Tear apart via a TRO consisting of a plethora of lies and gross exaggerations (much more the former) all “backed up” by an affidavit in which its contents and how it came to be constitute a colossal level of verified fraud. Said criminals 100% failed, and 100% failure will forever be their fate!
The State of Texas
Notary Public Unit
P.O. Box 13375
Austin, Texas 78711-3375
Jane Nelson
Secretary of State
Page 1 of 2
Revised 12/2022 Closing Letter to Complainant (Suspension)
Phone: (512) 475-1548
Fax: (512) 463-5255
Dial 7-1-1 For Relay Services
VIA 1st CLASS REG MAIL
January 25, 2024 Thomas Purcell 1313 Valley DR Denton, TX 76247 Re: Notary Complaint File – NCF #230071
Dear Mr.Purcell,
Please be advised that Alisha Morgan and The Secretary of State have come into an agreed settlement, in which her commission has been suspended for one (1) month. Ms. Morgan has been prohibited from performing any notarial acts for or in the State of Texas from December 27, 2023 thru January 25, 2024. Based on evidence provided in the complaint reference above, the Office determined that Ms. Morgan violated the following notary laws:
Failure to complete all sections of her notary record book correctly and consistently
Such violation constitutes the Secretary of State’s office to take action against the notary’s commission. 1 Tex. Admin. Code §406.014
Failure to keep a record of all notarizations.
Such action provides good cause for the Secretary of State’s office to take action against the notary’s commission. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann §406.014; 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.30; 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.31 (19)(2018)
Recording personal information in her record book.
Such violation constitutes the Secretary of State’s office to take action against the notary’s commission. 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.50; Tex. Att. Gen. Open Records Decision No. 684
Performing a notarization when the signer did not personally appear before her at the time of notarization.
Such action provides good cause for the Secretary of State’s office to take action against the notary’s commission. 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.40; 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.30; 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.31 (14)(2018)
Notarizing a false certificate.
Such action provides good cause for the Secretary of State’s office to take action against the notary’s commission. 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.40; 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.30; 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.31 (10)(2018)
Failure to safely secure notarial materials.
Such action provides good cause for the Secretary of State’s office to take action against the notary’s commission. 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.54 (a); 1 Tex. Admin. Code §87.30; 1 Tex. Admin.
Code §87.31 (22)(2018)
This Office does not represent you, as the complainant, and cannot seek restitution for any monetary damages, determine the validity of the document in question, or decide contractual or other disputes between parties.
Please contact this office if you have any questions or require additional assistance.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Laura Valerio
Notary Public Complaints
Phone: 512-475-1548
Frendle threatened to sue me in both April and July 2022 for “textbook defamation”, as her pathetic attorney, Bobby D. Greene, likes to phrase it. (The threat has not been revoked). Greene has lied his sorry ass off for over 17 months and counting by numerous times telling my former attorney he would turn over Frendle’s records ”soon.” Records Frendle is SUPPOSED TO BE PER CLEAR AS DAY COURT ORDERS REQUIRED TO ASAP PRODUCE (see proof in .pdf section below), such as her notes and numerous emails between she and her partner in crime, former opposing counsel, Amanda Coffey -- such as from when those two and Coffey’s paralegal/notary/malpractice coordinator Alisha Morgan blatantly as can be conspired to commit affidavit fraud on 1/21/2022. Frendle actually admitted to the fraud on the stand after I hired a documents expert to verify several alterations and proof of Frendle NOT signing while in front of a notary (the proof is that there is no original of it - because that requires two original ink signatures and morally bankrupt Frendle admitted on the stand to signing her copy at home in Carrollton while her fellow hardcore fraud addict Alisha Morgan was in Denton). Frendle is also hiding in blatant violation of crystal clear court orders (see below) ALL emails she’s had with the opposing party. ALL communications are supposed to be shared with both sides, none remain private. Please read about the affidavit fraud and documentation thereof by scrolling up and clicking on the link at the top of this window.
Just how obviously does Frendle make clear she is in fact monumentally corrupt? Here’s how.. Out of the dozens and dozens of blunt as hell statements (facts) and mounds of documentation I have posted on this website detailing Frendle’s life of crime, at a Dec. 20, 2022, hearing while on the stand for a full hour Frendle only claimed one thing on my website is untrue, her marital status. Just check out all the damning as hell FACTS I have on that soulless criminal posted on this website, most very well documented. Yet all she has to "prove" that I'm treating her "so unfairly" is that I list her as married and she CLAIMS to now be divorced from her husband.. Why should I believe she and her beloved husband, Cokehead Jeffery Frendle, weren’t married and living in the same house in Carrollton during the early morning hours of 12/29/21 when he was arrested for possessing 1.12g of cocaine while getting a DWI for being passed out behind the wheel of a RUNNING vehicle? The enclosed 12/29/2021 arrest report lists Cokehead Jeff’s address as being the same as that of his lovely wife Jen.
Frendle feels completely invincible when it comes to accountability for her crimes – regardless of the county in which she commits them. The preceding is due to her 20 YEARS of lying in court documents left and right in Dallas County -- where she works for Dallas County Family Court Services and thus is a coworker of every Dallas County judge --
INCLUDING HER GOOD FREIND, CORRUPT TO THE EXTREME KIMBERLY BROWN. The judge who DIRECTLY and ILLEGALLY helps Frendle suppress evidence of her falsification of custody evaluation reports – and ILLEGALLY pretends Frendle’s reports are truthful and unbiased. Judge Brown also likes to swear in buddies to be associate judges despite KNOWING they don't live in Dallas County and thus can't legally be a Dallas Co. judge!
Frendle continued committing perjury by claiming during a hearing that she had contacted three of my references when in fact she in 22 MONTHS of having my case only contacted one. And out of all the dozens of statements I’ve posted on this website confirming Frendle is biased and otherwise corrupt beyond anyone's wildest imagination, the one and only statement Frendle claimed on the stand I lied about is my claiming she’s still married to Jeffery Frendle. Literally every other claim (fact) I have posted on this website was not at all challenged by soulless Frendle -- only challenged by her liar for hire (attorney) Bobby D. Greene. He doesn't specify a single statement of mine as being allegedly false. Yet he calls this them as a whole "textbook defamation."
Jeffery and Jennifer Frendle were listed as being at the same house when on 12/29/21 husband was arrested for second DWI while possessing 1.12g of cocaine (arrest record enclosed). And last year “no longer together” partners in crime Jeffery and Jennifer Frendle went to the Carrollton police department together and recruited (or already knew) a literally confirmed to be dirty cop*, Bryce Anthony, to call to lie and threaten me.
*Carrollton’s city attorney admitted Anthony is on what's called the "Brady List" – cops highly suspected of being corrupt in one or more ways who literally are supposed to not be trusted as a witness.
Jennifer Frendle is immoral to the point she openly advocates for child abuse. Suffering a monumental level of undeniably long-term highly traumatic emotional abuse is exactly what a custody evaluator desires for a child anytime he or she: 1) knowingly issues a report loaded with literally dozens of patently false statements and omission (coverup) of dozens of glaringly pertinent good facts about the better parent and a mountain's worth of despicable facts about the other parent for which Frendle was "somehow" motivated to create a COMPLETELY rigged custody evaluation report, 2) uses her "findings" to "justify" recommending a 10yr old child be emotionally devastated for many years by having his good, loving, protective always there for him in EVERY way since birth (always 50/50 custody and in reality more), NO red flags father literally 99% stripped from his life! Well-documented facts (in my case and others) prove morally bankrupt Frendle perpetually and intentionally does the exact opposite of her #1 job responsibility: act in the child’s best interests.
***Click "More" button at top right of page for link to many more lovely pics of Cokehead Jeffery Frendle, several showing him violating terms of bond. His arrest report for cocaine and a second DWI is below.
***Are we supposed to believe that after 19 years of marriage and committing crimes possibly at an even more frequent clip than her beloved Jeffery that "I'm invincible" Jennifer Frendle never does any of the cocaine Jeffery brings home?
One father (whom I've met in person and think very highly of) just had Frendle issue defamatory to the umpteenth degree evaluation “findings”, declare he "needs" to have supervised custody only. DISGUSTING! In all the months Frendle had his case, she NEVER contacted any of his six references and didn't change the date of home visit when the father immediately informed her his kids will be with their mother on the date Frendle scheduled! Yep, a custody evaluator didn't even care to see how the kids (two) interact in the home with their father, stepmother, and stepbrother! Frendle is the epitome of laziness and corruption! She is just too damned lazy and apathetic to either schedule her visit during the dad's possession time or just keep the same date and direct the kids' mom to bring the kids over! Frendle just doesn't care how big of fraud she so clearly proves herself to be, or how many people find out she's NOTHING but a fraud, OR how many children suffer - or how badly they suffer - as a result of her insidious fraud.
Frendle in my case on 8/31/22 committed clear as day perjury on the stand when she unequivocally claimed she had contacted three of my references. IN FACT I know per all seven of the references I submitted that Fraud Queen Frendle only contacted one! And Frendle knew she contacted by far the least important reference.
I saw Jen in court on 8/31/2022 as she committed couldn't be easier to prove perjury (details below). She truly looked like hell. She and her husband's life of crime and the resulting public, legal, professional, and financial consequences are taking a massive toll on poor Fraud Queen Jen. She's 54 but easily passes for 65. The last time I saw poor Jen prior to August was in June 2021 when she only looked about 58 (fire orange dyed hair and all... a site about as lovel as site as her hubby perched on her right shoulder in the pic above).
"INVINCIBLE" FRENDLE REALLY DOESN'T CARE WHO ALL LEARNS JUST HOW FRAUDULENT OF "METHODS" SHE USES OR HOW MANY FAMILY CODE STATUTES AND COURT ORDERS SHE VIOLATES TO COME UP WITH HER CUSTODY EVALUATION "FINDINGS" and hide her notes and emails sent to and received from the opposing party and counsel.
Frendle really is openly and shamelessly evil. I don't think she would be able to function if she ever went through the hell of losing her "inalienable right" (as totally allowed by her bosses at Dallas County Family Court Services) to commit hardcore, highly destructive fraud -- custody evaluations overflowing with dozens of acts of known to be pure defamation, dozens of acts of suppressing obviously pertinent evidence, and then multiple times committing perjury to "so well" hide said fraud! Frendle really does believe she has the right to without consequence create evaluation reports knowingly falsified just as often and just as maliciously as her depraved mind desires.
Frendle is in fact a very disturbed individual who must as soon as legally possible be prevented from destroying yet more children’s lives (she's done it for 18 years) just to feed her God complex and insatiable desire to get revenge for things such as when a "poor" female FALSELY accuses a custody battle father of calling her a fat ass! The preceding is one of the literally dozens of PATENTLY FALSE, no corroborating evidence (obviously) accusations made against me for which Frendle never asked me for my side of the story! For the record, I never said that or anything close to that!
DIRECT VIOLATION OF FAMILY CODE: Frendle hid OVER TWENTY allegations from me and my attorney. Meaning we didn't know the allegations even existed until we read them in Frendle's final report, all listed as fact or "appears to be the case"! Many of the despicable allegations were received by Frendle over a year pre-report, and 98% of the sick, completely unsubstantiated allegations were made by three witnesses TIED AS CAN BE to the opposing side!
***Below is the undeniable evidence of Frendle seeing herself as having the right to declare multiple of the real judge’s clear-cut orders entirely inapplicable to her.
Frendle is such a narcissist that she literally thought if she had been successful in pressuring the hell out of me (conned me) into saying “OK” (my ex of course instantly said “OK”) to her desire for confidentiality (forever hide all notes, communications, and even the report itself from me – only read it in my attorney’s office while NOT taking notes) then ALL of the Court’s below-stated clear as day orders for FULL CUSTODY EVALUATOR TRANSPARENCY would no longer apply to her!
From: Jennifer Frendle <Jennifer@frendle.com>
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2021 10:43 PM
To: Haley Tarango <Haley@thewrightlawyers.com>
Cc: Amanda Coffey <amanda@coffeyhaynes.com>; Alisha Morgan <alisha@coffeyhaynes.com>; Patrick Wright <patrick@thewrightlawyers.com>
Subject: RE: Cause No 15-10574-211; ITIO Purcell
Mr. Wright,
Two things: 1. When will I be able to receive a copy of the recent depositions?
2. A while ago I asked about having the possibility that my custody evaluation could be protected, so that a full copy of the evaluation was not to be provided directly to the parties. Ms. Coffey indicated that she did not have an issue with that, but I don’t believe I ever heard an answer from you.
I am concerned that the nature of this highly conflicted case may add fuel to the fire between the parents. My intention is to give the Judge clear information and for it to hopefully settle some of the issues between the parents, and not cause any additional upheaval for Ryan or the parents.
Thank you,
Jennifer Frendle
Yeah, accept as fact 30-plus patently false allegations made against me from my ex and her daughters without Frendle ever telling me (illegal to hide from me state law) the allegations existed, much less allow me to tell my side of the story, will do wonders to "settle some of the issues"! As will telling the judge she “knows” I literally couldn’t effectively coparent with anyone on earth and that I have disrupted my son at school (“disregards (the child’s) need to have a safe and calm school environment") when I haven’t caused a single disruption to my son or any other kid at his school – and no teacher or other employee has ever claimed I have!
From: Jennifer Frendle <Jennifer@frendle.com>
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 10:53 AM
To: Patrick Wright <patrick@thewrightlawyers.com>; Amanda@coffeyhaynes.com
Subject: Eiland v Purcell Child Custody Evaluation
I tried to send this last night, but I saw it never went out. Sending it again today.
Hello,
I am letting everyone know that I will file the child custody evaluation in the Eiland v Purcell case tomorrow, Friday January 21, 2022. Due to the volume of documents, I am not sure how I will be able to send it, but I will figure it out in the morning.
I am filing a letter to the Court along with my notice of filing the CCE. The letter states my strenuous concerns about either parent being given a copy of the report directly by either attorney or any law office staff person.
It is my preference and suggestion that the parents be allowed to review the concerns and recommendations portions of the report with their respective attorney present, but not take notes, make copies or make any audio or video recordings.
I am also requiring specific rules about potential communication with me by the parents in the future. No phone calls, emails or texts from the parties will be answered. If the parties and/or attorneys have substantive information to add to the evaluation, or any errors are discovered that change the meaning of the report (other than grammatical errors), the parties’ attorney may send one letter of no more than ten pages, listing out the information to be added/addressed. If this information changes the recommendation, then an addendum to the evaluation will be filed.
Thank you very much,
Jennifer Frendle, LPC
Court orders Frendle IN FULL declared she can ignore if both parents cave to her pressure to say it's "OK' for her to ignore:
12. IT IS ORDERED that the Evaluator shall prepare a report containing his/her findings and conclusions and shall therein offer an opinion regarding the conservatorship, possession of, and/or access to the child. The child custody evaluation shall be conducted and the report shall be prepared in accordance with the following standards and requirements:
a. the Evaluator’s actions shall be in conformance with the professional standard of care applicable to the Evaluator’s licensure and any administrative rules, ethical standards, or guidelines adopted by the state agency that licenses the Evaluator;
b. the Evaluator shall disclose to each attorney of record any communication regarding a substantive issue between the evaluator and an attorney of record representing a party in a disputed suit, provided, however, that this requirement does not apply to a communication between the Evaluator and an attorney ad-litem or amicus attorney;
c. the Evaluator, to the extent possible, shall verify each statement of fact pertinent to the child custody evaluation and shall note the sources of verification and information in the report;
d. the Evaluator shall state the basis for the Evaluator’s conclusions or recommendations in the report;
e. as required under Texas Family Code §107.108, the report shall contain Evaluator’s name, license number, and a statement attesting that the Evaluator has read and meets requirements of Texas Family Code §107.104.
14. IT IS ORDERED that following the preparation of the report, the child custody evaluator, at the written request of any Court-ordered guardian ad-litem, Court-appointed attorney ad-litem, Court-appointed amicus attorney, or attorney of record in the case shall make available for inspection and copying all records collected, including but not limited to the following: Copies of the Evaluator’s notes, any written communications, writings, records, memoranda, summaries, data, correspondence, test results, videos, photographs, tape recordings, and other tangible records or documents obtained by or created by the Evaluator in connection with or in any way related to the evaluation ordered herein. The costs of copying the records shall be borne by the requesting party, should that party desire copies of any portion of the records to be made.
15. IT IS ORDERED that no information gathered by the Evaluator, including any conversation between the evaluator and any party, child, investigator, attorney, or collateral source, is confidential or protected by any privilege. The Court finds that pursuant to Rules 509 and 510, Texas Rules of Evidence, NO RIGHT OF CONFIDENTIALITY OR PRIVILEGE attaches to any communications between or with the Court-appointed child custody evaluator, the parties, or any other person with whom the Evaluator interacts, that are relevant to this proceeding. Information provided by the parties may be shared with others involved in the evaluation (including where necessary and appropriate, child and collateral sources) so that verification of information provided can be sought and so that others are afforded the opportunity to respond to allegations that may have been made. The evaluator shall inform any party, child, attorney or collateral source that any information received shall not be confidential or protected by any privilege or discovery.”
Frendle also gets laser-focused for vengeance anytime she learns a litigant dared to exercise his or her RIGHT to record in the confines of his or her own home ANY conversation he or she wishes, even the rather manly voice of Her Majesty Jen!
Read Frendle's 4/2/22 letter (in .pdf section) for the "reasons" she claims give her the right to forever hide any and all records she desires. Frendle has gone 18 months now refusing to turn over a single one of several dozen records first requested from her Mar 18 and again on Apr 15 -- at least a few of which are undoubtedly very damning to her and her puppeteers, such as Frendle's emails with soulless attorney, Amanda Coffey. (Coffey is so addicted to lying that she can't keep herself from stating bald-faced/couldn't be easier to disprove lies right to the judge's face).
Frendle damned well knows I have many times over more evidence than needed to DESTROY her in court if she ever follows through on the MANY threats she's made to file a patently frivolous defamation suit against me. Threats all made through her slimeball attorney Bobby D. Greene.
It's a fact that a custody evaluator repeatedly not giving a parent the chance to tell his or her side of the story or present exonerating evidence = pure corruption. Corruption that is irrefutably illegal per Family code (see code below).
*Please scroll to Jeffery Frendle's pic in the .pdf section to:
A) read details of his current record (DWI conviction), B) read the 12/29/21 arrest report for his second DWI while in possession of 1.12g of COCAINE, C) learn how Jen “earns” thousands above her base evaluation rate of $1600 per parent (to pay her often unemployed husband's legal bills, for instance) by showing up to post-report depositions ($250 hr), hearings ($500, even if cancelled), and trial ($1000 a day!) to "explain away" her report "findings" being a massive pile of pure fraud. “Findings” chock full of known to be lies and glaring omission of critical facts; portraying hearsay within hearsay as verified fact; hiding allegations from the parent she has in her defamation crosshairs (hide until she states them in final report); and failure to contact four of the five reference names she was given!
Again, Frendle is such a liar that she unequivocally claimed under oath that she contacted three of my references! And to yet further prove her “evaluation” was from at or very near the get-go completely fixed, Frendle did not contact my son’s teacher – the teacher who confirmed via written deposition that (name redacted) 100% put words in her mouth (to defame me) within her affidavit (redacted) that her attorney attached to a TRO app!
The public obviously has the need for the facts to be spread so that people can learn why they need to do ALL THEY CAN to ensure they and their children are never in any way subjected to the evils of conscienceless habitual criminal/child-destroyer Jennifer Frendle.
JENNIFER FRENDLE'S LIES
The below truly entails less than 15% of the overall number of PROVEN TO BE bald-faced lies Frendle stated in her 1/21/2022 Custody Evaluation Report for my case.
1) Frendle's lie, top page of her report: "CONFIDENTIAL Use restricted to officers of the Court and Attorneys of record."
My attorney and I TWICE refused Frendle her HUGELY desired wish for confidentiality -- to hide her report's so-called documentation (over 600 pages) -- many containing one or more of (redacted) literally several dozen bald-faced lies. Frendle literally has no morals, shame, or credibility. It should surprise no one that Frendle still tried to intimidate my attorney into withholding over 90% of the report via her "CONFIDENTIAL" stamp. Jen must have been shocked my attorney didn't hesitate for a second to provide me with the FULL report -- gave to me the same day he received it! How could my attorney so flagrantly violate Her Majesty Frendle's self-granted "right" to forever hide over 90% of her report (all accusations, tons of evidence and so-called evidence, and witness and alleged witness names) from any litigant she so desires?
2) Frendle (to prove her lack of attention to detail) stated the following about her visit to (redacted): “The family has some outdoor cats, chickens, and two large, friendly dogs.” The “two large, friendly” dogs part is in reality a chihuahua (6 pounds max) and a Boston terrier (12 pounds max) who absolutely hate people they're not used to being around and even those they are very familiar with but somehow don't always recognize.
Frendle's above glaring report errors are what naturally occur anytime an apathetic, lazy as can be, mega-corrupt evaluator goes 14 MONTHS (Nov 2020 to Jan 2022) between visiting each home and issuing her “findings" without reviewing her notes (if she even took any)! Who besides frequent users of heavy drugs and others majorly cognitively impaired spends 90 minutes at a quite rural house and later "recalls" the owners having two large dogs that do NOT and never have existed and basically a field full of cats that in reality was and always has been one cat?
My attorney forced Frendle via court order to finally issue report. Of course Frendle delayed the hell out of issuing her giant batch of lies (report) due to hoping that would cause me to have no time before trial to try to get her insidious lies thrown out! She miserably failed!
I retained a very highly respected child custody evaluation expert. He is not an LPC but rather a child psychologist. He ripped apart Frendle's report!
3) Frendle lying about what I had told her: “(The child) does sleep in my bed.”
The above "accidental" misquote of Frendle's is pure bullshit. The fact is, and as I reported to Frendle, my son has for at least FIVE YEARS had a queen bed in his own room in which he of course is free to sleep in any time he wishes – which he does an average of once or twice a week each time I possess him – as I also reported to Frendle. There is no excuse for Frendle to LIE to the Court by stating my 10yr old son always sleeps with me (king bed), has no other choice but to sleep there, and that "until recently" he didn't even have his own bed or bedroom! Despicable!
4) Frendle lie: "The father was in trouble for trespassing on the administrative office/school grounds."
She is a total disgrace!
THE TRUTH: In May 2019 I and another person picketed Northwest ISD over major disagreements with how my son and other students had been treated as well as atrocious, patently false, totally disproved claims a certain administrator made against me. As I of course explained to Frendle and as she confirmed – or should have – via reviewing the FWPD record she was provided, my “trespassing” entailed:
A) picketing right alongside a road, over a mile long Texan Drive, that's open to the public 24/7/365 and 50-plus yards from ANY school building and HUNDREDS OF YARDS away from NISD’s administrative offices!
B) FWPD resource officer gave me a written warning -- because I did not know in May 2019 (and I’m sure 95% of Northwest ISD residents still don’t know) over mile-long Texan Drive is owned by the NISD due to it being deeded over to the district in 2017. It in every way appears to be a public road as there is a fire station, doctors' offices, and there are of course no “No Trespassing” or “For school business only” signs – and as mentioned above it is open 24/7/365 to all members of the public, including hundreds of commuters who use it daily.
5) Frendle's lie: “There is a living room with a fish tank that has dead fish parts floating in it.”
Frendle is so overtly biased and so much wants to provoke me into having a giant fit in a communication directly sent to her (for “innocent” her to cry to the judge about) that she stooped to claiming in her report that my 29-gallon aquarium, quote “ha(d) dead fish parts floating in it" during her one single visit (90 mins tops) to our home during the 18 months she "evaluated" me. (WHY didn't she come back several times if I'm such a danger to my son?). The “dead fish parts” were in fact chunks of decaying cucumber for my Plecostomus (sucker) fish (they love it) and a SHED crawdad shell or two! Whether Frendle is knowingly lying by claiming dead fish parts were in my aquarium or lying because of being too stupid to tell the difference between cucumber and fish parts, it’s obviously absolutely pathetic for any evaluator to blab about a parent’s CLEAR WATER (not dirty) fish tank in a child custody evaluation report!
The aquarium part of her report and so many other obvious b.s. parts add up to being nothing but bait – bait colossally corrupt Jennifer Frendle is absolutely shocked and extremely disappointed that I have not and never will take. Had lover of facilitating child abuse Frendle known I would not take her bait to yell and curse at her or whatever, I strongly believe she’d have created a report having far fewer lies and far fewer glaring omissions. She was convinced that since I had directly confronted her fellow shameless compulsive liars (such as Jeffrey Siegel, Mark Foster, and a few others) over their mile-long string of lies there’d be no way I could abide by her "order" at the end of her report to only contact her through my attorney. Cokehouse Jen really thought I’d have such a colossal fit that her reporting it to the judge would cause her to totally ignore the evidence of her sick lies and advocating for child abuse, only punish me for chewing "poor" Jen out for committing heinous crimes! Sorry your bait 100% failed, Jen.
Snooty and monumentally corrupt Frendle was provided a gargantuan amount of exonerating evidence proving I’ve been the subject of an insidious, absolutely unimaginable 3.5 years and counting smear campaign. The fact is that despite requesting and receiving $600 extra to do so, Frendle either didn’t review any of that exonerating evidence (even video) or just pretended it doesn’t show what it truly so obviously does show!
There are a lot of highly corrupt acts being committed by a lot of Denton County vermin with Dallas County Frendle obviously glad to directly aid and abet the overt corruption in a very major way -- and I’ve obviously been victimized by it to the extreme and my son greatly endangered. A good ol' boy network that believes such a high number of perceived to be “reputable people” committing OUTRAGEOUS fraud left and right will always automatically mean those on the outside looking in will immediately and fully believe: 1) the liars have to be telling the truth, and 2) the innocent people along with their families who've been so damaged and threatened by the lies are “denying the obvious -- no reason to 'waste time' reviewing any audio, video, or documents they claim verify their being persecuted based on lies."
The Denton County good ol’ boy network of corruption includes one scumbag I’ve had plenty of run-ins with, Justin PD’s chief Alejandro Coss – the vermin who so overtly swept a rape under the rug (read about the widely reported Laci Hay Uber driver rape) that he got the JP prosecutor (behind Laci’s back) to give a Class C misdemeanor, stay out of jail free plea deal to the rapist! Coss did that because he “lost” the evidence – after lying by telling the victim that he had sent the evidence, a condom fragment, to a lab for testing!
6) Frendle’s quoting of hearsay lies – actually so unprofessional and otherwise pathetic that she quoted hearsay within hearsay retrieved from a website chat space! Chat space lies posted by the City of Justin’s proven beyond all doubt monumentally corrupt police chief/rape coverup specialist Alejandro Coss. See section on Coss below about his love of doing things such as his extensive cover up of said rape and overtly supporting officers blatantly as can be falsifying incident reports. Frendle portrayed all of Coss’s website blabbing to be rock solid fact without ever interviewing dirty as hell Coss (a former Dallas cop). And of course it goes without saying she never asked for my side of the story.
Here is Frendle relaying and commenting on Coss’s giant batch of lies and gross omissions of glaringly important facts in her custody evaluation report "findings": “Although it does not directly mention the father’s name, the letter the Justin Police Chief posted on the official Justin website [how the hell is Frendle so stupid that she calls Nextdoor a city’s official website?] clearly outlines the father’s pattern of conflict with others.” ***I should not be ridiculed, much less punished, for standing up (“conflict with others") to several morally bankrupt Denton Co. public officials over the last three years who’ve stated one lie about me after another.*** Frendle quote continued “In it [in Coss’s website chat lies], Chief Coss stated ‘when he [me, the author of this website] doesn’t get his way, he progresses up the ladder. He has harassed teachers, school administrators, and district officials for over a year simply because he disagrees with their policies and decisions.’ "It is likely that the father will continue to behave in this manner [daring to strongly stand up to horrendous corruption], specifically after this report is completed, unless he is prohibited from doing so.” Lies, lies, and more lies - deplorable!
This website has been up since 2/4/2022 and I made Frendle’s beloved fellow compulsive liar, (redacted), aware of the website on day 1 as well as quickly forwarded the link to my site to at least twenty Denton County law offices. Obviously, Cokehouse Jen long ago learned of this website. Why then hasn’t “innocent” Jen even tried to get the court to prevent me from disseminating the truth about her being a shameless libelist and her openly and so very strongly lobbying for children to suffer horrendous years long emotional abuse due to Frendle over and over again lying to the Court??
As far as Coss claiming I have no right to disagree with administrators’ policies or decisions, sorry for the fact I will not agree with anyone whose decisions include defaming me and/or propagating the lies of their fellow good ol' boy corrupt as hell public officials – such as Coss propagating the lies about me stated by resigned in disgrace deputy superintendent Rob Thornell. Resigned in disgrace after having been caught having sex in Northwest ISD's admin bldg in Dec 2019 with a subordinate employee (a principal’s wife no less). Thornell has 4 or 5 kids and his mistress, Emily Conklin, has three. Emily and husband Sandy quickly fled to the Houston area to leave Emily’s indiscretions and their joint monumental level of embarrassment "forever" behind at the end of the 2019-2020 school year. Did Coss or any other cop call for Thornell and mistress to be arrested for having sex in a school building? Of course not. It was all covered up. Thornell even got an additional six months (over $100K) of salary plus stellar benefits after being kicked out of the district! The "bursting with integrity" Texas Rangers were just fine with that too.
Until he was caught with his pants down (literally), Thornell was a key component of Denton County’s cesspool of corruption – thus I say there's no doubt he literally could have been caught in a school building having sex with a way under-aged student and in all likelihood, it would have been completely swept under the rug! The preceding really is just how corrupt Denton County has become – corrupt to the point several public officials undeniably and overtly don’t care about even the basic well-being of children.
7) Frendle’s lie: “He (me) has attempted to file misdemeanor charges… on Dr. Foster.”
I never attempted to file charges on shameless hack-quack court evaluator/super freak (unilaterally chosen by opposing counsel) Mark Foster and pretty sure I never threatened to do so. I did expose the hell out of “Doctor” Mark Foster for two things. One was his pinning four psych labels on me, such as “persecutory ideation”, with literally Foster not one time stating what I had allegedly said or done that so-called warranted any one of the four labels. And secondly, as stated in the first section of this website, I called out Foster for being so corrupt he ILLEGALLY gave a litigant (me) legal advice – advice he obviously knew was patently false and potentially very damaging to any litigant to which he tells such a despicable lie. The false legal advice shameless hack quack Mark Foster illegally gave me (which I recorded) was his trying to convince me it was vital for me to tell him all about an expunged record regarding a false accusation for which a charge was never filed (due to a court officially ruling it to be what it so obviously is – a violation of my 1st and 14th Amendment rights to peacefully and without any vulgarity complain via email to a few of Denton County’s most corrupt public officials). Nevertheless, shamelessly corrupt Mark Foster stated the below to me after I was honest with him about the FALSE accusation AND told him it had been expunged. After I told him, quote “I’d really rather not get into it” (legally I could have answered “No” when asked if I had ever been detained by police), mega-corrupt Mark Foster replied verbatim: “Well, the reason I ask [for details of what a court officially declared I should have never been accused of committing] is if the other side questions me about it and they question me on the stand and I don’t know about the charge then it’s gonna undermine my testimony – if I end up giving testimony. It’s entirely up to you [how gracious of him]. I’m just saying that’s the consequence of me not knowing about it.” As I’m sure most of you know, everyone involved in a court case is required to portray an expunged record as if it and all so-called evidence relating to it never existed. Foster’s above quote so much further proves the Denton County courts have numerous evaluators known to be corrupt as hell. Mark Foster is a scam artist quack; shameless puppet of whichever side of a custody battle throws him the business.
8) Frendle’s lie: “No one, no matter the ability would be able to have a healthy coparenting relationship with the father.”
I’m proving soulless Frendle wrong about the above right now.
I’m sorry, Jen, but you do not know me. The fact is I would have a very good coparenting relationship with anyone who's honest (NOT literally addicted to defaming me), and does NOT have a huge sense of entitlement, and does NOT relish the thought of seeing me stripped out of my child's life without one bit of concern for just how badly traumatized that would cause my child to be!
9) (Redacted)'s bald-faced lies that he or she stooped to having her two now adult associates parrot for Frendle to publish (or is the following a matter of Frendle being like (redacted) in loving to "quote" phantom hearsay?): “When interviewed, the (redacted) reported that (me, Tom Purcell) was often critical of them... They stated that (I, Tom Purcell) said
I'm a good father in every single way my son needs me to be, we love each other dearly and have a very tight bond! We often go swimming, biking, and fishing, play a TON of basketball (his favorite hobby BY FAR) and do many other things together. I look very forward in the near future to doing things with him such as getting another bird dog (haven't had one in almost ten years) and us going to Kansas to experience my favorite hobby, pheasant hunting behind a good dog.
I teach and protect my son very well and always have - and Frendle damn well knows that! It is pure evil for Frendle to want her great love of defaming me and otherwise abusing her position to lead to my son having me 99% stripped from his life! I've always had at least 50% custody of my son and from ages 4 to 6 2/3 he was with me well over 60% of the time due to his mother CHOOSING to leave an in-town job to take a job that entailed her traveling 4 to 7 days straight literally over 1/3 of the year. I GLADLY took care of our son all on my own during the over 300 days in total she was not around for him!
Please note that supervised custody (WILL NEVER HAPPEN) means for the vast majority who have that imposed on them either choosing between staying above water financially by rarely seeing their child or see their child a lot and thus soon go heavily into debt as supervised custody averages $50 an hour! I dare say few people have $500 a week extra to be paying to buy just ten hours with their child!
For Frendle to tell the Court "it's best" for my son to have me, his three dogs, his best friend, and what has ALWAYS been his main home completely taken away from him is pure evil! It is in fact Frendle highly desiring and advocating for an innocent child to FOR MANY YEARS be greatly emotionally hurt and scarred for life! Hurt and scarred just so Frendle can relish knowing how upsetting that is to the parent she absolutely hates for reasons that have NOTHING to do with the person's level of parenting!
Jenniifer Frendle is in fact a very depraved and sadistic individual who belongs in a jail cell for all the children's lives and good parent's lives she's ruined and attempted to ruin as a result of egregiously exploiting her position over and over again for 14-plus years!
Because of helping him study a total of 7-8 hours over two weeks' time (NONE of his other side of the family helped him study beyond a few mins - per my son), giving him pointers on how to remember to spell certain words, and most of all my son's devotion to his education, he as a 3rd grader won the Justin Elementary Spelling Bee in December! The bee consisted of two finalists from all 3rd - 5th grade classes -- 23 kids total (one didn't make it), 2/3 of which were 4th and 5th graders! So VERY proud of him for his spelling bee win and all his other educational success! And many times over more proud of him for NOT following the lead of certain people and instead becoming an honest, kind, compassionate, loving, empathetic, conscientious and fair-minded human being! It is truly a sad fact that several people are disgusted that my son has greatly developed the above said traits.
Frendle's levels of corruption and arrogance know no bounds.
My attorney's very blunt response to Frendle's below lies is in the next section. My attorney is Patrick Wright. I left Chrysandra Bowen because she many times proved herself to be just as incompetent, apathetic, and cognitively-challenged (and somehow mega-arrogant too, as well as always unapologetic) as Frendle is corrupt. Please, please contact me if you've retained or are thinking of retaining Bowen. Once you read Bowen's idiotic assumptions and conclusions and compare them to the facts of the case plus realize the two very simple but critically important legal issues of which Bowen inexplicably did not address or inform me of, you'll have no doubt having Chrysandra Bowen as your custody battle attorney is asking for the worst possible outcome for you and your kid(s).
Do a keyword search of this website for "Dickson" if you believe I think every attorney stinks. Amanda Dickson did an excellent, honorable job for me during round 1 of the custody battle (Dec 2015 - Apr 2016).
***Please remember to read both pages of the .pdf below
Frendle works for Dallas County Family Court Services; she only moonlights in Denton County. Though she’s not even qualified to work Denton County cases because she does not have and never has had an office here. The #1 stated requirement for those wanting to do child custody evaluations in Denton County is having an office in Denton County (see https://www.dentoncounty.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1305/Child-Custody-Evaluator-Guidelines-PDF).
Dallas County corruption that Frendle ILLEGALLY spills over into Denton County:
I strongly believe the main reason Frendle openly commits one act of fraud after another without thinking twice, only rarely trying to cover her tracks, is because Frendle's fellow Dallas County employees (judges) have for 14 years apparently let her get away scot-free with any and all fraud she desires to commit -- regardless of how egregious, regardless of how frequently committed, and regardless of how damaging the consequences are for children or how many children in total are badly hurt for years due to Frendle’s lies and coverups. I have much proof (via two sources - a litigant and an attorney I personally know quite well) of one Dallas judge very recently aiding and abetting the coverup of a mountain's worth of Frendle's fraud and doing it via the blatant suppression of obviously free speech, even violating attorney-client privilege to do it. I will possibly post details of the preceding at a later date.
Below are two of the threats Frendle sent to me thru her attorney, Bobby D. Greene. Not one time has either Frendle or Greene specified a single statement of mine they claim constitutes defamation or misinformation -- because each full well knows what I post about Frendle is VERY well documented fact -- so well documented due to her being too corrupt, stupid, and arrogant to cover up the evidence of her colossal level of fraud. I hope Frendle's attorney, Bobby D. Greene, will enlighten me (via my attorney) regarding just what part(s) of my website constitute "textbook defamation" (Greene's quote in his letter pasted below quote). FACTS I'VE POSTED FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD detailing Greene's client knowingly falsifying the absolute hell out of a COURT report on which the quality of my 9yr old son's life could very well hinge. A report that literally entails at least twenty instances of violating Family Code and/or the Court's orders.
***I also know that Frendle and her husband went to the Carrollton police dept about a month ago and recruited a very young and very gullible cop to call me up to falsely proclaim certain parts of my website are "illegal." The cop even stooped to claiming the pic I posted of Jeffery Frendle is illegal because it humiliates him. Sorry, info acquired via open records requests is NEVER illegal to disseminate. Luckily the Carrollton PD has at least one honorable and knowledgeable officer, Sgt Anthony Sayre. Sgt Sayre called me back to unequivocally apologize for the junior officer lying to bullying me in an attempt to intimidate me enough to take my website down on behalf of "poor, innocent" SOULLESS HABITUAL CRIMINALS Jennifer and Jeffery Frendle.
From:
April 25, 2022 Bobby D. Greene
214.698.8001 (direct)
310.730.9308 (mobile)
To: (my attorney)
Patrick Wright
The Wright Firm, L.L.P.
1760 S. Stemmons Freeway, Suite 100
Lewisville, Texas 75067
Re: In the Interest of R.B.P. - Jennifer Frendle - Cease and Desist
Dear Mr. Wright:
Thank you for speaking with me this afternoon. Please let this letter serve as our demand
that your client, Mr. Purcell, cease and desist all defamatory communications regarding my client,
Jennifer Frendle. This includes, but is not limited to, the web site created by your client to defame
Ms. Frendle, www.corruptcustodyevaluator.com. This web site is targeted solely at disseminating
misinformation to the masses about Ms. Frendle.
My client has received numerous calls and
messages from people in the community letting her know that the web site existed and that your
client sent them the link. By every definition, this is textbook defamation.
It goes without saying, but your client’s actions are beyond inappropriate. I am certain the
judge in this case would not look kindly upon his actions – and it would not bear well for his
chances at custody. Therefore, we are requesting you have your client take down the web site
immediately, and cease any and all smear campaigns he has against her. Otherwise, I will
encourage my client to file a defamation lawsuit against him.
Best regards,
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Bobby D. Greene
BDG
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 17:35:58 +0000From: Greene, Bobby D. <Bobby.Greene@wilsonelser.com>To: Tom Purcell <purcelltb@verizon.net>CC: patrick@thewrightlawyers.com <patrick@thewrightlawyers.com>
Mr. Purcell, please refrain from ever writing me directly. If you have something you’d like my client or myself to know, go through your attorney.
Patrick, I’ll reiterate our cease and desist request from April 25, 2022, requesting your client to stop defaming my client, and take down his web site. Apparently, you haven’t done so. We will have a defamation suit filed against your client if that web site is not down within the next couple of weeks, and Mr. Purcell does not stop defaming my client to other people. It is simply unacceptable.
Thank you
Bobby D. Greene
Attorney At Law
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Bank of America Plaza - 901 Main Street, Suite 4800
Dallas, TX 75202-3758
214.698.8001 (Direct)
310.730.9308 (Cell)
214.698.8000 (Main)
214.698.1101 (Fax)
bobby.greene@wilsonelser.com
Last two pages of .pdf = request Jen has ignored for 4 mos.
*Please remember you have to click on the deal at the bottom of page 1 to get to pages 2-10. The motion is eight pages. The last two pages consist of my attorney's 4/15/22 records request Jen has ignored for four months despite judge's clear as day order (stated in the contempt motion itself). The despicable acts and undeniable evidence thereof that I've posted on this website (with considerably more to come) verify beyond all reasonable doubt Jennifer Frendle is a majorly corrupt, highly disturbed individual.
*Yes, I finally realized that I have my attorney's 4/15/22 letter posted twice. Oh well...
Does Jennifer Frendle “suffer from" ASPD? In my opinion the traits of ASPD (see below) and a mountain of evidence proves the obvious answer is YES -- a textbook case of ASPD is why Jennifer Frendle has an insatiable desire to: 1) lie, 2) hide dozens of very damning facts about the parent benefiting from her overt bias while hiding dozens of very important good facts about the parent who's a victim of her raging bias and limitless desire for revenge, 3) hide literally any and all records she wishes in direct defiance of the Court's clear-cut, all-encompassing order, 4) submit her report to the court without an order to do so and otherwise commit criminal acts while 100% convinced of being immune to all accountability, and 5) get the massive power-trip high she attains when she abuses her position to the point a child is emotionally destroyed for many years because Jen's lies and coverups caused a very good, very high possession time for nearly a decade parent to suddenly be completely stripped from the child’s life!
From Mayo Clinic’s website:
Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) signs and symptoms may include: 1) Disregard for right and wrong
A trait Jennifer Frendle obviously and frequently demonstrates.
2) Persistent lying or deceit to exploit others
A trait Jennifer Frendle obviously and frequently demonstrates.
3) Being callous, cynical and disrespectful of others
Traits Jennifer Frendle obviously and frequently demonstrates.
4) Using charm or wit to manipulate others for personal gain or personal pleasure
***Frendle was quite good, not perfect though, at hiding her intentions (keeping cards close to vest) prior to hitting me with her tsunami’s worth of defamation (report) after 18 months of “so honorably and thoroughly” reviewing and weighing the evidence.
5) Arrogance, a sense of superiority and being extremely opinionated
Traits Jennifer Frendle obviously and frequently demonstrates.
6) Recurring problems with the law, including criminal behavior
Dozens of times knowingly falsifying a report (and then illegally submitting it to Court without it having been ruled admissible) – a report that could be used to determine a 9yr old child’s fate for the next nine years of his life – obviously constitutes major criminal behavior. Jen so overtly feeling completely immune to all accountability for blatantly numerous times horrendously/INTENTIONALLY falsifying a child custody report should make everyone wonder if her husband (see section dedicated to Jeffery Frendle on this site) is the only member of the Frendle household who does cocaine (see PD report in .pdf section); a drug that often results in the user repeatedly committing several high-risk behaviors while perpetually believing themselves immune to all consequences for their abhorrent behavior.
7) Repeatedly violating the rights of others through intimidation and dishonesty
A trait Jennifer Frendle obviously and frequently demonstrates. Search this site for “threat” to read about the intimidation tactics God complex-infested Frendle has used on me; tactics that have 100% failed and will continue to 100% fail. And as far as “dishonesty”, Jen should be required by law to have "I am morally bankrupt" tattooed on her forehead in 2” letters.
8) Impulsiveness or failure to plan ahead
The “plan ahead” part couldn’t be any more applicable.
Obviously Frendle didn’t do any planning… no covering up of her crimes. Thus thanks to her off the chart depraved mind and feeling above all laws and rules applicable to her profession, she has committed multiple crimes to greatly trample my rights, greatly endanger my son, and greatly piss on the Court by overtly violating several of its most fundamental rules as well as orders specific to this case -- the chief rule Frendle perpetually ignores is of course "Act in the child's best interests." No planning ahead and her feeling of immunity to all accountability have already caused Cokehouse Jen to pay a considerable, totally legally inflicted public price and additional major professional and legal consequences are very much a possibility in the near future.
9) Hostility, significant irritability, agitation, aggression or violence
Jen is almost as hostile as she is dishonest. Though she desperately tries to portray a laid back, "not at all looking for conflict" persona.
10) Lack of empathy for others and lack of remorse about harming others
Traits Jennifer Frendle obviously and frequently demonstrates. Jennifer Frendle appears to not be capable of feeling any empathy for either a custody battle parent or child -- UNLESS he shows complete submission to her bullying, lying, double standards, and other horrendous abuse of position acts she expects to commit with impunity and without anyone complaining one bit. Obviously Frendle has no remorse when she badly hurts such a litigant or his/her child(ren) with her dozens of sick lies and covering up of obviously vital facts to get revenge against that parent for daring to insist Frendle respect his or her rights, abide by the rules of the Court, and abide by the ethics code of her profession.
11) Unnecessary risk-taking or dangerous behavior with no regard for the safety of self or others
Very applicable.. To feed her God complex, insatiable desire for revenge, and desperate need for more money to keep her husband out of prison for DWIs and cocaine, Jen has repeatedly acted with reckless disregard to the potential public, professional, and personal consequences of her egregious, child-endangering, criminal behavior.
12) Poor or abusive relationships
I’d say 53yr old Jen relishing feeding her massive God complex via falsifying the hell out of child custody reports to very badly hurt children while being in an 19-year marriage with a 47yr old (second husband) found passed out behind the wheel of a running vehicle a couple miles from home at 4:25am while intoxicated (second DWI) and in possession of 1.12g of cocaine doesn’t exactly constitute a healthy relationship. And I’ll go out on a limb and assume the same is the same with Jen’s first marriage (1994-1998) to a guy named Oscar Lopez.
13) Failure to consider the negative consequences of behavior or learn from them
Traits Jennifer Frendle obviously and frequently demonstrates.
*See ‘11’ above. And I imagine her husband isn't too happy about the public and possibly professional consequences he's incurred as a result of his wife committing malfeasance on a massive scale due to not considering the consequences (because literally saw herself as immune to any and all consequences).
14) Being consistently irresponsible and repeatedly failing to fulfill work or financial obligations.
A trait Jenninfer Frendle obviously and frequently demonstrates. Frendle dozens of times hiding allegations from me (to prevent me from telling my side of the story and present evidence that I'm telling THE TRUTH), her gross omissions of key facts, her wild and usually totally wrong guesses, and her covering up of even blatant perjury in which a parent was PROVEN BEYOND ALL DOUBT to put words in a teacher’s mouth to try to steal all of the other parent’s custody via TRO = Jennifer Frendle is the epitome of corruption and irresponsibility and obviously repeatedly fails in many ways to fulfill her work (professional) obligations.
*****Laws (amongst others) Jennfer Frendle flagrantly violates.
Despite my attorney reminding Frendle prior to issuance of her report that the following has been the law for over two years, Frendle immediately submitted her report to the Court anyway. "ADMISSION OF THE EVALUATION INTO EVIDENCE Custody evaluations are no longer filed with the Court. The easiest method of admitting the Evaluation into evidence is through the evaluator by proving up the evaluator as an expert. If that is done through Texas Rules of Evidence 705, the evaluation may come into evidence as a 'disclosure of facts or data underlying expert opinion.'” In other words, Frendle took away my legal right for the Court to NOT possess her report unless one or more hearing(s) result in it being ruled admissible!
Sec. 107.108. GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO CONDUCT OF CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATION AND PREPARATION OF REPORT. (a) Unless otherwise directed by a court or prescribed by a provision of this title, a child custody evaluator's actions in conducting a child custody evaluation must be in conformance with the professional standard of care applicable to the evaluator's licensure and any administrative rules, ethical standards, or guidelines adopted by the licensing authority that licenses the evaluator.
(b) A court may impose requirements or adopt local rules applicable to a child custody evaluation or a child custody evaluator that do not conflict with this subchapter. *****(c) A child custody evaluator shall follow evidence-based practice methods and make use of current BEST evidence in making assessments and recommendations.
*****(d) A child custody evaluator shall disclose to each attorney of record any communication regarding a substantive issue between the evaluator and an attorney of record representing a party ievaluator shall follow evidence-based practice methods and make use of current BEST evidence in making assessments and recommendationsply to a communication between a child custody evaluator and an attorney ad litem or amicus attorney.
(e) To the extent possible, a child custody evaluator shall verify each statement of fact pertinent to a child custody evaluation and shall note the sources of verification and information in the child custody evaluation report prepared under Section 107.113. [Literally over half of Jen's claims in report, both those she concocted and those she parroted, are either known (by her from the get-go) to be patently false or totally unverified even when she could have easily verified level of veracity].
(f) A child custody evaluator shall state the basis for the evaluator's conclusions or recommendations, and the extent to which information obtained limits the reliability and validity of the opinion and the conclusions and recommendations of the evaluator, in the child custody evaluation report prepared under Section 107.113.
Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 832 (H.B. 772), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2007.
Redesignated and amended from Family Code, Section 107.0513 by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1252 (H.B. 1449), Sec. 1.09, eff. September 1, 2015.
Sec. 107.109. ELEMENTS OF CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATION. (a) A child custody evaluator may not offer an opinion regarding conservatorship of a child who is the subject of a suit or possession of or access to the child unless each basic element of a child custody evaluation as specified in this section and each additional element ordered by the court, if any, has been completed, unless the failure to complete an element is satisfactorily explained as provided by Subsection (b).
(b) A child custody evaluator shall:
(1) identify in the report required by Section 107.113 any basic element or any additional element of a child custody evaluation described by this section that was not completed;
(2) explain the reasons the element was not completed; and
(3) include an explanation of the likely effect of the missing element on the confidence the child custody evaluator has in the evaluator's expert opinion.
(c) The basic elements of a child custody evaluation under this subchapter consist of:
(1) a personal interview of each party to the suit seeking conservatorship of, possession of, or access to the child;
(2) interviews, conducted in a developmentally appropriate manner, of each child who is the subject of the suit who is at least four years of age during a period of possession of each party to the suit but outside the presence of the party;
(3) observation of each child who is the subject of the suit, regardless of the age of the child, in the presence of each party to the suit, including, as appropriate, during supervised visitation, unless contact between a party and a child is prohibited by court order or the person conducting the evaluation has good cause for not conducting the observation and states the good cause in writing provided to the parties to the suit before the completion of the evaluation;
(4) an observation and, if the child is at least four years of age, an interview of any child who is not a subject of the suit who lives on a full-time basis in a residence that is the subject of the evaluation, including with other children or parties who are subjects of the evaluation, where appropriate;
(5) the obtaining of information from relevant collateral sources, including the review of:
(A) relevant school records;
(B) relevant physical and mental health records of each party to the suit and each child who is the subject of the suit;
(C) relevant records of the department obtained under Section 107.111;
(D) criminal history information relating to each child who is the subject of the suit, each party to the suit, and each person who lives with a party to the suit; and
(E) notwithstanding other law, records or information from any other collateral source that may have relevant information;
(6) for each individual residing in a residence subject to the child custody evaluation, consideration of any criminal history information and any contact with the department or a law enforcement agency regarding abuse or neglect; and
(7) assessment of the relationship between each child who is the subject of the suit and each party seeking possession of or access to the child.
Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 832 (H.B. 772), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2007.
Redesignated and amended from Family Code, Section 107.0514 by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1252 (H.B. 1449), Sec. 1.10, eff. September 1, 2015.
Amended by:
Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 257 (H.B. 1501), Sec. 3, eff. September 1, 2017.
Sec. 107.112. COMMUNICATIONS AND RECORDKEEPING OF CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATOR. (a) Notwithstanding any rule, standard of care, or privilege applicable to the professional license held by a child custody evaluator, a communication made by a participant in a child custody evaluation is subject to disclosure and may be offered in any judicial or administrative proceeding if otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence.
(b) A child custody evaluator shall:
(1) keep a detailed record of interviews that the evaluator conducts, observations that the evaluator makes, and substantive interactions that the evaluator has as part of a child custody evaluation; and
(2) maintain the evaluator's records consistent with applicable laws, including rules applicable to the evaluator's license.
(c) Except for records obtained from the department in accordance with Section 107.111, a private child custody evaluator shall, after completion of an evaluation and the preparation and filing of a child custody evaluation report under Section 107.113, make available in a reasonable time the evaluator's records relating to the evaluation on the written request of an attorney for a party, a party who does not have an attorney, and any person appointed under this chapter in the suit in which the evaluator conducted the evaluation, unless a court has issued an order restricting disclosure of the records.
(d) Except for records obtained from the department in accordance with Section 107.111, records relating to a child custody evaluation conducted by an employee of or contractor with a domestic relations office shall, after completion of the evaluation and the preparation and filing of a child custody evaluation report under Section 107.113, be made available on written request according to the local rules and policies of the office.
(e) A person maintaining records subject to disclosure under this section may charge a reasonable fee for producing the records before copying the records.
(f) A private child custody evaluator shall retain all records relating to a child custody evaluation conducted by the evaluator until the ending date of the retention period adopted by the licensing authority that issues the professional license held by the evaluator based on the date the evaluator filed the child custody evaluation report prepared under this section with the court.
(g) A domestic relations office shall retain records relating to a child custody evaluation conducted by a child custody evaluator acting as an employee of or contractor with the office for the retention period established by the office.
(h) A person who participates in a child custody evaluation is not a patient as that term is defined by Section 611.001(1), Health and Safety Code.
Added by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1252 (H.B. 1449), Sec. 1.14, eff. September 1, 2015.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 751, Sec. 15, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.
Redesignated and amended from Family Code, Section 107.054 by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1252 (H.B. 1449), Sec. 1.15, eff. September 1, 2015.
Amended by:
Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 257 (H.B. 1501), Sec. 7, eff. September 1, 2017.
Sec. 107.114. INTRODUCTION AND PROVISION OF CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATION REPORT. (a) Disclosure to the court or the jury of the contents of a child custody evaluation report prepared under Section 107.113 is subject to the rules of evidence.
(b) Unless the court has rendered an order restricting disclosure, a private child custody evaluator shall provide to the attorneys of the parties to a suit, any party who does not have an attorney, and any other person appointed by the court under this chapter in a suit a copy of the child custody evaluation report before the earlier of:
(1) the third day after the date the child custody evaluation report is completed; or
(2) the 30th day before the date of commencement of the trial.
(c) A child custody evaluator who conducts a child custody evaluation as an employee of or under contract with a domestic relations office shall provide to the attorneys of the parties to a suit and any person appointed in the suit under this chapter a copy of the child custody evaluation report before the earlier of:
(1) the seventh day after the date the child custody evaluation report is completed; or
(2) the fifth day before the date the trial commences.
(d) A child custody evaluator who conducts a child custody evaluation as an employee of or under contract with a domestic relations office shall provide a copy of the report to a party to the suit as provided by the local rules and policies of the office or by a court order.
Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 751, Sec. 15, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.
Redesignated and amended from Family Code, Section 107.055 by Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1252 (H.B. 1449), Sec. 1.16, eff. September 1, 2015.
Amended by:
Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 257 (H.B. 1501), Sec. 8, eff. September 1, 2017.
Arrest report is at the end of this section.
Please remember you have to click to get to pages 2, 3, and 4 of the report.
*Three pages of the report aren't included; they contain repetitive and irrelevant information.
Are we supposed to believe Jen had "no idea, was totally surprised" to learn her husband of OVER 19 YEARS was caught with cocaine? Are we supposed to believe there's just no way conscienceless, feels immune to ALL accountability, openly immoral (VERY close to amoral) Jennifer Frendle has in all their years of marriage never used any of the cocaine she by all appearances has never had ANY problem with her husband bringing home?
Jennifer Frendle's cokehead/DWI x2/Deadbeat husband Jeffery Frendle. See arrest record below -- the latest being 12/29/2021. Jeff's tens of thousands in legal bills (and rehab bills?) for DWI while in possession of 1.12g of cocaine (per Carrollton PD report obtained via FOIA, see report in the .pdf section below) and frequent unemployment very likely played a major role in why morally bankrupt Jennifer Frendle chose to so blatantly and frequently falsify my case's evaluation report -- BECAUSE she "earns" thousands POST-REPORT via testimony fees every time a parent she defames demands she under oath "explain away" her sick lies -- and when a parent's attorney (such as Amanda Coffey) openly conspires with Jen (via forged affidavit, for example.. enclosed) and then pays her to get on the stand and blab a few dozen of the lies stated in her evaluation "findings." Per her signup paperwork, Frendle gets $500 to show up to a hearing, $1000 per day to testify at trial, and $250 AN HOUR to be deposed.
Obviously with Jeff’s legal troubles -- facing 2-10 years in prison for possession of cocaine while passed out behind the wheel with engine running, failure to pay debt to the point he’s being sued by BoA, and not being able to hold a job (see rap sheet, BoA suit, and Jeffrey's LinkedIn account below), it must be presumed Jennifer Frendle’s one-sided to the extreme custody evaluation reports are due to her being desperate to "earn" MUCH more to pay her and her reckless as hell druggy/deadbeat husband's legal bills (and apparently unilaterally pay all their other bills). Again, anytime Jennifer Frendle frequently and/or very egregiously lies about a parent for whom she is aware adamantly stands up for his or her child(ren) and his/her parental rights and Frendle believes that parent has the resources to fight back against her lies, she counts on "earning" thousands more (see her testimony fees quoted above) than the base $1600 each parent pays to have Jen grace them as their evaluator.
Jennifer Frendle knows (quite possibly only via other evaluators telling her) that issuing a report that’s anywhere close to middle of the road usually results in the parents quickly settling and thus no post-report easy hearing, deposition, or trial testimony BIG BUCKS for poor Jen.
Booking Number: 21047991Booking Date: 12/29/2021Age: 47Gender: MRace: White
Penalty Group 1 – The drugs found under penalty group 1 have no medicinal purpose and a very high risk of abuse. Penalty group 1 drugs tend to have the highest penalties. Examples include: Methadol, cocaine [what Jeffery Frendle was busted for], oxycodone, methamphetamines, ketamine, heroin, Morphine, Fentanyl, Desmoprhine or “Krokodil”, and types of codeine.
(Tx. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481-115.) One gram or more, but less than four grams—a fine of up to $10,000, at least two (and up to ten) years in prison, or both.
The State of Texas vs Jeffery Alan Frendle Case Number: CR-2001-05719-C - Denton County Criminal Courts 12/11/2002 Application for Court Appointed Attorney & Financial Affid. Docket 09/11/2002 Finding Regarding Indigence; DENIED - NO FINANCIAL NEED Docket 09/11/2002 Arraignment hearing; (8:30 AM) Result: Failure to Appear Docket DEF. MOVED 3 YEARS AGO; 10-10-2001 Docket 08/10/20008/10/2001 Affidavit for Arrest Warrant Docket 12/18/2002 Probation; (Judicial Officer: Garcia, David D); 1.DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED-BT; Confinement to Commence; 12/18/2002; 0 Years, 0 Months, 180 Days, County Jail, Denton County Jail; CSCD; 0 Years, 22 Months, 0 Days; with Community Service of 70 Hours; BALANCE DUE AT 80.00 PER MONTH BEGINNING 01/17/03; Provisions (Other); CNSLG - W/IN 60 DAYS COMPLETE DRUG/ALCOHOL EVAL. Provisions (Other); MIS - CONSUME NO ALCOHOL DURING PROBATION. Provisions (Other); CNSLG - W/in 181 days complete Safety Education Prog. PAY $20.00 TO CRIME STOPPER FUND. Provisions (Other); CNSLG - W/IN 181 DAYS COMPLETE DWI VICTIM IMPACT PANEL. Docket 12/18/2002 Plea;; 1.DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED-BT; Nolo Contendere Disposition; (Judicial Officer: Garcia, David D); Defendant: Frendle, Jeffery Alan
Bank Of America, N.A. VS. Jeff Frendle Case Number: CV-2019-04125 Case Status: Pending - Filing Date: 11/21/2019 Judges: Ramirez, Robert C. Denton County Court At Law 2 Case Type: Contract - Debt Collection Docket Entries Docke12/06/2019 Service Returned Doc 11/22/2019 Frendle, Jeff; Served; 12/03/2019; Returned; 12/06/2019 Financial 11/22/2019 Plaintiff: Bank Of America, N.A.
Has Jennifer Frendle ever done a thing to try to prevent her husband from taking illegal narcotics?
Has Jennifer Frendle ever tried to stop her husband from driving while high? If so and her husband drives off anyway, does Jen call the police so that her husband can be quickly pulled over instead of spending as many hours as he desires endangering thousands of innocent lives?
Which was more upsetting to Jennifer Frendle in the early morning hours of 12/29/21 -- her husband put in jail for DWI #2 while in possession of a top level most illegal narcotic OR the fact the at least 1.12 grams of cocaine her husband scored that night ended up in a Carrollton PD evidence locker instead of on Jen's kitchen table?
With Jennifer Frendle's husband of over 18 years (as of 12/29/21) pulling out of their driveway around 4am (see time on arrest report below) with apparently no fear of Jen objecting (much less fear she would call the police), are we supposed to believe there's just no way Jen is anxious for her husband to get back home after a cocaine run so a good part of it can go up her nose?
Are custody evaluators required to report to the state anytime a cohabitator is busted for being in possession of a top level most dangerous/most illegal narcotic?
Not only has her husband been sued for failure to pay debt, per his LinkedIn account Jeffery Frendle has been unemployed since last Aug (details below).
JEFFERY FRENDLE'S LINKEDIN WORK HISTORY AS OF 2/12/2022: Help Desk Technician Tier 1, 2 and User Management AdministratorHelp Desk Technician Tier 1, 2 and User Management Administrator BSN SPORTS · Full-timeBSN SPORTS · Full-time Dec 2017 - Aug 2021 · 3 yrs 9 mos Farmers Branch, Texas, United States Helpdesk TechnicianHelpdesk Technician Crow Holdings CapitalCrow Holdings Capital Jun 2015 - Mar 2017 · 1 yr 10 mosJun 2015 - Mar 2017 · 1 yr 10 mos Dallas, TXDallas, TX Technical Support Coordinator Technical Support Coordinator SureQuest Systems, Inc.SureQuest Systems, Inc.Nov 2014 - Jan 2015 · 3 mosNov 2014 - Jan 2015 · 3 mos Carrollton, TXCarrollton, TX Children's Health Deployment EngineerChildren's Health Deployment Engineer ModisModisJun 2014 - Oct 2014 · 5 mosJun 2014 - Oct 2014 · 5 mosDallas/Fort Worth AreaDallas/Fort Worth Area
Jen picked the wrong Dad for character assassination. Just so stupid for she and her husband to have such a rare last name (i.e. easily searchable name) and SO MANY dirty deeds to hide and yet still here she is out making new enemies out of totally innocent victims by commi9tting more major crimes! Make no mistake about the fact Jennifer Frendle is GREATLY advocating for my son to suffer SEVERE emotional abuse so that she can get revenge against me and "earn" thousands more of my hard-earned money to pay her drug addict/DWI/deadbeat husband's legal bills! You're damned right advocating for permanently stripping a 9yr old from his good NO CRIMINAL RECORD OR ANY OTHER RED FLAG father he loves very much, is very close with, and who has always taken care of him very well SINCE THE DAY OF HIS BIRTH - and possessed him well over half the time since birth - constitutes knowingly advocating for that child to go through an enormous amount of emotional suffering for years! As it is majorly emotionally abusive to recommend a child be permanently stripped from the three dogs he loves very much and permanently stripped from the comfort and security he feels in his lifelong main home -- and permanently taken from his very good friend who lives next door (they play almost daily during my weeks of my possession).
***Again, please remember you have to click to see the last three pages of the arrest report posted below
One of Frendle's many NEVER interviewed hearsay within hearsay ZERO CREDIBILITY "witnesses" she took at face value: proven to be dirty as hell (and very proud of it) Justin PD chief Alejandro Coss. Coss got on Nextdoor on 10/12/2020 and - amongst his spouting off a ton of laughable "I'm totally honorable" propaganda - he claimed I had lied about him -- and of course he couldn't pass up the opportunity to further abuse his position by further defaming me. Coss is just like Frendle -- so inherently evil he's literally incapable of stopping himself from stating obvious lies no matter how much irrefutable evidence there is of the truth. Openly unAmerican Coss loves to be judge, trial, and jury just like his puppetmaster/sugar daddy -- a certain mega-corrupt local school administrator whose stench left town in the summer of 2022! YES!
Coss's abhorrent abuse of position to the umpteenth degree Nextdoor batch of lies and gross exaggerations is nothing compared to three years ago when Coss showed his true corruption colors more clearly than ever. A Justin woman, Laci Hay, was raped by an Uber driver (she hasn't stayed anonymous... has been on Ch. 11 and other major media). Ms. Hay reported the assault quickly and then eight days after the assault informed Justin PD that a condom fragment had come out. Coss thought Laci made up the whole rape allegation (rape FACT) and that the condom fragment was just a part of her "games", so he waited FOUR DAYS to order an officer go pick it up. Disgraceful. Even though it was a stranger rape, Coss doubted Ms. Hay's (married with two kids) story all along -- thus he "misplaced" the evidence! (I think we all know what "misplaced" really means). Though he told Laci initially that it had been sent for testing! Didn't tell her the truth until over a year later!
Once dumbass Coss finally realized the victim wasn't the easy pushover he initially judged her to be and that she'd continue to demand justice be served (and Uber rapes automatically making the news), Coss decided to try to shoot down her credibility by having Officer Curtis Watkins knowingly lie in a report (cops knowingly and horrendously falsifying incident report is literally standard operational procedure at Justin PD, as I have irrefutable proof of). Watkins claiming Ms. Hay had the condom fragment on the day of the rape but chose to wait 12 days to provide it to police! Sickening! Coss and his fellow dirty as hell Justin PD cops (Watkins, Mejia, Theilmann, Davis) are a disgrace to every honorablye officer and citizen. They have no shame whatsoever.
Being desperate to sweep under the rug his "losing" of the DNA evidence once he realized the victim had the willpower and courage necessary to NEVER stop demanding justice, and that she had gotten state and even national media coverage due it being an Uber driver who had drugged and raped her, Coss WITHOUT TELLING MS. HAY BEFOREHAND (much less getting her approval) had the JP prosecutor sneak a simple assault Class C misdemeanor plea to the rapist! Thus thanks to Coss, $2000 and a few anger management classes is all the punishment a p.o.s. got for drugging and raping a longtime resident of Justin! Even though the charge did not mention sexual assault, the rapist accepting the plea was in fact Coss knowingly giving him double jeopardy protection -- he can now never be prosecuted for the rape. Double jeopardy protection was of course EXACTLY Coss's goal just as soon as he realized the victim and the media were not going to let the story go away. Coss of course dreaded the thought of being on the stand at a rape trial "explaining away" how he waited four days to order a cop drive two miles to collect a condom fragment, then quickly "misplaced" that DNA evidence, and then lied to the rape victim by claiming it had been submitted for testing when the truth is he had "lost" it!
Despite the rapist getting such an easy way out plea deal, it's obviously inexcusable of Coss to not tell the victim her report had resulted in a charge being filed. Coss nor anyone else at Justin City Hall informed Ms. Hay of the charge until weeks after the fact! Obviously an HONORABLE and CONCERNED for victims police chief makes sure to NEVER leave a victim of a violent crime in the dark when his or her attacker has been charged. Ms. Hay went WEEKS not knowing she was more likely - and her husband and two young kids more likely - than ever to have her attacker seek revenge over she not staying quiet!
Coss proves over and over again that he is completely unconcerned about the welfare of any Justin resident who dares exercise their rights in any wayhe doesn't like. He fully expects everyone to either kiss his slimy, nasty ass or at the very least keep their mouth shut when they don't like things such as his overt policy of having officers blatantly falsify incident reports and then refuse to revise them -- even when the proposed revision is as obvious as one's phone history literally proving ZERO phone calls were made to the "victims" upon one of Coss's fellow PIGS writing in report "excessive" calls were made! And things like "just outside Justin city limits" get left as is to "justify" bullying someone who's in fact NON-CRIMINAL actions occurred far outside Justin PD's jurisdiction. And "far" is no exaggeration -- the "victims" of phantom phone calls and my completely legal texts were at their fellow compulsive liar X person's house six miles outside of Justin (two miles deep into Wise Co. at the time JUST ONE of them, her dad, received the texts over a four-day period.
Coss and gang's abuse of power knows no bounds. If any major act of violence is committed against me then Coss should be the #1 suspect. (Yes, even more of a suspect then (redacted) and family.
For all of you propaganda sponges in Justin who blindly back dirty as hell Coss due to being naive and gullible as hell (or else mega-corrupt yourself) and thus portray all his lies and gross exaggerations as fact (or pretend to believe him), how would you feel if you or a family member got raped and then upon being informed of DNA evidence Coss wait four days to send an officer to collect it? Or how about if it was your daughter and Coss had an officer (Curtis Watkins or other soulless puppet) KNOWINGLY and BLATANTLY lie about a critical evidentiary fact to try to destroy your already mega-distraught daughter's credibility?
Or how about 18-19 months after the assault you ask Coss why still no DNA results and you finally get informed lab never received condom fragment due to it being "lost" without any part of it ever having been sent to thelab?
Or how would you like it if you and/or your daughter crossed paths with the rapist weekly year after year because Coss kept the guy out of jail by GOING BEHIND YOUR BACK to give his fellow scumbag a Class C misdemeanor stay out of prison plea deal? (The victim, Ms. Hay, does not cross paths with her rapist. But it's not as if Coss would care if she did).
Sadly it seems half or more in Justin don't care how many incident reports Coss and gang falsify or how many felonies they sweep under the rug while lying about the victims in an attempt to destroy their credibility -- don't care AS LONG AS their life or the life of a loved one doesn't become pure hell as a result of Coss's colossal level of corruption, his total ignoring of victims' rights, his total indifference to victims' suffering, and having no problem with leaving a rapist on the streets.
It's very sad that Justin's city manager, Chuck Ewings, is too cowardly (or too much loves corruption?) to call for Coss's termination. Former city manager Cori Reaume, who mysteriously left her position in the fall of 2020, is just as anti-democracy, anti-constitutional rights, abuse of position-addicted, and otherwise every bit as openly/majorly corrupt as Coss.
Coss is a former Dallas cop. It's a total joke for Justin's politicians to claim he was the best candidate for the job. They knew (and so much better know 4-5 years deep into his infestation of Justin) that the only thing dirty as hell and proud of it Coss was the best candidate for is aiding and abetting their corruption!
Pompous and dishonest as hell Coss is just nauseating. He thinks he's a real badass but obviously he's just a total disgrace. As referred to above, he is a lover of lies to the point he'll insist his underlings (the corrupt ones, such as Victor Mejia and Watkins) leave as is KNOWN TO BE multiple patently false claims within incident reports. It's a VERY, VERY disturbing thing to in person witness a mega-dirty cop (Coss) knowingly leave verified to be loads of patently false information in a report (i.e. refuse to order officer revise it) and then crack a crooked smile for several seconds that - without actually saying it - very much conveys "I know what the law is but my stooge (Mejia) and I are going to continue breaking it (leave incident report knowingly falsified to hell) and there's nothing you can do about it!" Coss is just one big pompous, corrupt to the core scumbag and he KNOWS the evidence proves it.
Coss smugly refuses (along with his fellow soulless PIG Victor Mejia) to take out even the most obvious of lies from incident reports, such as when Mejia stated in a June 2020 report I had called (X person's dad and his wife "excessively" when the FACT is I didn't call either of them a single time! Unless you count one time SIX YEARS EARLIER!
Coss also had no problem with Mejia threatening to arrest me for "violating" a statute that had ten months earlier been thrown off the books for being unconstitutional. Yep, Coss doesn't even require officers keep informed of what laws no longer exist.
I know it's very hard for people to believe I'm not lying about or exaggerating in the least what giant pieces of _ _ _ _ infest Justin and Denton County in general. But I am telling the truth and not exaggerating anything. And I have stated the facts UNDER OATH! Let's see Coward Coss state his lies under oath. The opposing side actually wants to depose Coss next month (Oct 2022)
Coss is just rotten. Though as I've mentioned Justin does have three good cops. How three good people (two males, one female) got hired onto the Justin PD with dirty as hell Coss as the chief is beyond me.
Coss's level of lying and his despicable, multi-faceted coverup of at least one rape obviously warrants "Disgrace" being written on his forehead in the above picture. And obviously warrants that he be fired. And if we lived in a community in which law and order and democracy were coveted by its "leaders" instead of corruption then of course Coss would be prosecuted for his many despicable, very damaging to innocent people crimes and for being DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for leaving at least one rapist on the street!
I have well over 30 mins of recordings of Coss running his mouth without seeming to at all censor himself. I'll post that audio on this website, if possible (I'm not good with technology). Arrogant and corrupt to no end PIG Coss blabbed a LOT of pretty shocking stuff.. Might indicate he needs to be drug-tested for him to say so much pro-corruption stuff all while my phone was in easy view. Amongst many other shocking things, Coss fully directed me to not call Justin PD's line for non-emergencies but actually call 911 instead. (I call the Justin PD very rarely, some years none). Call me crazy, but I thought calling 911 for non-emergencies and tying up an operator that could be helping someone having an emergency is illegal? When I brought that up with dumbass Coss, he doubled down by again saying I should call 911 for non-emergencies. He actually told me to call 911 "Cuz I pay for it." Yep, he describes the allocation of tax dollars as the allocation of his own money. He's just that loaded with malfeasance. Coss is true scum of the earth in every way.
Also while being taped Coss admitted he was just fine with, not even a bogus apology offered, a completely non-resistant detainee being physically abused and having a pic to prove it. Coss gets an enormous amount of sick pleasure from pissing on the basic rights of those of us he deems to have infinitely lesser value than himself. Every City of Justin official who does not call out Coss for being an undeniably massively corrupt, community-destroying, HUGE LIABILITY scumbag is a gutless disgrace who brings great shame to his or her family.
Copyright © 2024 corruptcustodyevaluator.com -- Jennifer Frendle - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.